English Yokel

Time to read Saul Alinsky "Rules for Radicals" again, to be sure what "they" are up to. And possibly to half-inch a few ideas for defensive action.

We take it as read that the Marxists of the EUssr have an agenda to destroy the Christianity of its subject peoples, and to replace it with wholesale dependence on a beneficent state to the exclusion of all others. Thus the blogger known as Archbishop Cranmer is not doing their bidding in his forceful defence of the orthodox teachings of the the Church of England Established. He must therefore be stopped.

Up to the mark promptly steps the LGTB lobby, or co-ordinated members seemingly acting on their behalf. Cranmer's articles are clearly intended to be part of a debate that ought to be happening within Britain today. [That it isn't, is because the Mainstream Enemedia (thanks to Pam Geller for the term) has decided to shut the debate down.] So they must find another route of attack. Lo, and behold, there is one. At the time fo the complaints and of writing this, Cranmer has adverts on his site for the Coalition for Marriage. To further inform the debate, they are reproduced below. The first forms the subject of the complaint. It is alleged to have caused 10 of the 24 (largely anonymous) complainants to consider that the ads were ‘offensive’ and ‘homophobic’.

How preposterous! It should have been laughed out of the ASA ‘Investigations Executive’ office! Instead they do the bidding of the politically correct (cultural marxist) nomenklatura!

Yokel expresses his full support for the traditional view of marriage (one man, one woman, for life), and opposes the warped "modernisation" that Cameron would introduce on behalf of his EUssr puppeteers.

Roll on the Streisand Effect! Oh, and chip in a few quid at his site, Cranmer is going to need a lawyer before this goes away.

Mail, Telegraph and Reuters carry this story. MOD leaflet (2 sides) via Brian Whelan who appears to live there.

For 95 years, the apparatchiks of the British Foreign Office have been doing their level best to undermine and destroy the Balfour Declaration. The military have recently found themselves fequently turned out to support Islamists almost anywhere that they can be found, but especially Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan. In all these instances, the intent (not necessarily revealed to the British public) has been to install an Islamist government based on Sharia laws.

Now it seems that the British military has "gone native". They are going to install surface to air missile launchers on the top of a residential complex in East London. How, oh how, is this any different from the utterly despicable practice of the Palestinians when shooting at the Israelis from within residential complexes. hospitals and schools?

The Palestinians do it to try to disable and defence by the Israelis who make every effort to avoid deaths amongst non-fighters. Let us be clear, it is not Israeli terrorists that the 2012 Olympics should be scared of, it is Islamic terrorists. The Islamic terrorists have no wish to minimise casualties, except amongst Muslims of their own sect. In their world view, everyone else "deserves to die" because they are Kuffar, and Allah hates them. So British military hiding amongst the civil population, most of whom don't want the ****** Olymic Games on their doorstep anyway, will give them no added protection.

The aim is obviously to safely shoot down any errant civil airliner that is nominally making its way into Heathrow but might instead be tempted to do a pancake landing on the Olympic Stadium. In their wisdom of course, the Powers That Be decided to put the Olympics under the flight path into Heathrow. At this point one can see from Flight Radar 24, that the planes are typically at 9,000 feet when they leave the stack and are directed to make their final approach. Enlarge the map quite a bit and where do you think the wreckage will fall? That's right straight onto inhabited residential, commercial and industrial areas. Enlarge the FlightRadar24.com map to see the streets, or use the satellite imagery to see the buildings. There is no agriculture in this part of London! Getting an address from an estate agents site then enabled Yokel to use Streetmap to show where it is. The old Water Tower seems to be near the South East corner of the site.

Once again, the British military will be doing the Islamist terrorists job for them, and cause maximum loss of life amongst ordinary Londoners. Yokel guesses that it is not by chance that none of the Olympic big-wigs will be staying in the Olympic Park area.

Surely the word for this sort of action is IMMORAL, isn't it?

Yokel has started reading "The Origins of Totalitarianism" by Hannah Arendt.

Initially written in 1949 as a study of an ongoing trend, by the time the last edition was prepared, Professor Arendt thought she was writing a history. Yokel praises the Lord that He took Professor Arendt home in 1975, before it became apparent that the peace and prosperity of the post-war baby boomers was just a lull in hostilities and that "normal service" was shortly to resume.

Today we see around us that resurgence of totalitarian ideology; from Islam with its push to impose Sharia on the whole world, via the EU(SSR) with its completely self selecting and self perpetuating governance, to Britain with the necessary enabling acts (the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, and the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006) and a politicised police force (the private company that is ACPO Ltd) already in place.

Professor Arendt traces these traits of modern governance back to the early 1800s, quite a bit further than Yokel had previously supposed. It is clearly now impossible to change the course of our rulers, and we must instead witness to our fellow citizens that they do not fall for the glib smarm that will condemn them to eternal hellfire.

The book is written in the "old style". It is scholarly and without pretence. There are references and footnotes on almost every page to justify assertions and statements. If you wish to read and review this book yourself, Yokel thinks you may find the following links of use to start your research:
Wikipedia, Amazon, eBay, Internet Archive, and Bookfinder.

The London Borough of Bexley, and the Urban Districts of Kent that preceded it, was where Yokel was dragged up. Yokel knew it had gone downhill since he left the area, but "Oliver Cromwell" has unearthed a lot more. It seems that he has upset the local bigwigs by being a bit rude about them. If only half of what Olly Cromwell belives is true is actually well founded, there is enough to be worried about.

But to quote a fictional Private Pike, "They don't like it up 'em!" So Olly Cromwell is looking a prison term in the face. And for what are reputedly false allegations invented by persons with some secrecy to keep.

What was that about "free speech?"

It is in keeping with Sharia though. They didn't want it exposing or saying, so exposing it or saying it is Islamic Slander. Bit by bit it creeps in.

Bexley is Bonkers
You've been Cromwelled

Tips of the hat to Raedwald, Katabasis (who has a "new readers start here" outline of the history), and Spidey (who has a longer outline of the laughable case against Olly Cromwell).

John Imrie has written a letter to the Independent, published April 4th, 2012:

Imagine a country where every time someone visited your home the secret police recorded who they were and how long they stayed.

Imagine a country where every time you left your home you were followed and where you went was recorded, along with how long you stayed and everyone you met.

Imagine a country where the government who passed the laws enabling this said that there was nothing to worry about as the secret policemen would not record any of the conversations you had with any of the people you met.

Imagine Britain for every internet user after the Government’s snooping law is passed.

Thanks to No2ID Newsblog.

But WHY? Look for the EU dimension. Look for the cover-up.

Twenty years ago Yokel visited Russia. He observed how fear of the Secret Policeman influenced quite a lot of what was said and done.

Yokel was alarmed when, last Thursday, he read in the Evening Standard about the death of the Jihadi in Toulouse. That the Jihadi wanted to die with his guns blazing was to be expected. That way he expected to be met by 72 virgins on his arrival at the celestial bordello that is Islamic Paradise. [He will know by now that he has been lied to.]

The scans are from Thursday's print edition. The sections in question either never made it on-line, or have subsequently been removed. Maybe Yokel should be alarmed about this apparent digital censorship, but as he doesn't hang around the Evening Standard web site like a groupie, he can't tell which it was. Click on the part scan above for an image of the whole article.

It wasn't even the knee jerk reaction of the little man who calls himself President of France that alarmed Yokel, for he is a politician and all he knows is knee jerk reactions. In this case he promised a ban on access to extremist web sites. "Fair enough", you might say, "all we are talking about is preventing ordinary Muslims from being turned into radicals by preachers of hate. Denying those folks access to those web sites is good, denying access to the rest of us is acceptable collateral damage."

Maybe, if you don't, can't, or won't understand.

For the Koran has many more statements that Allah hates the Christians, Jews and Polytheists than it ever has of peace and tolerance. Same with the Hadith. And when there is peace and tolerance, then it is only directed for the benefit of the Muslims, for Allah hates the Christians, and the Jews, and the Polytheists with a vengeance and wishes them only an afterlife full of the most horrific tortures that a 7th Century Arab could dream up. Yokel could go on quite a bit longer, but please just acknowledge that the Koran has hate written all the way through it just like a stick of Blackpool rock has its place name. So it is the non-radical Muslims who are out of step with their religion, not the radicals. [The word you are looking for to describe non-radical Muslims is "apostate", and the Sharia punishment for apostasy is death.]

Understanding that "radical Islam" is in fact the true Koranic Islam, Yokel then turned his attention to considering what web sites would be banned. Of course they will be any that tells the truth about Islamic belief, whether to Muslims or the Kuffar, leaving the saccharine sweet taqiyya sites to ply their evil trade of telling the gullible that "Islam is a Religion of Peace (tm)". [Kuffar is the highly derogatory name applied to non-Muslims. Taqiyya is the Islamic doctrine of lying to advance the cause of Islam.]

Then it struck Yokel that one of the provisions of the "Pact of Umar" is that non-Muslims would not be allowed to teach their people (the truth) about Islam. [The Pact in brief, and with commentary.]

So when the Firewall of Great Britain comes to be implemented in order (it is hoped) to keep Muslims from being radicalised, amongst other things, please recognise it for what it actually is. Firstly it is a monument to the Jihadi in Toulouse (and not to his victims). And secondly it is an essential step in keeping the truth about Islam away from the people.

For when the people know the truth about Islam, their reactions are not what their rulers desire.

.

The Mail moans: "Desecrated: The shocking video of Churchill's Desert Rats' graves being smashed to rubble... by the Libyans we helped liberate" What did they and our apology for a government expect. The behaviour described in the article is exactly what Muslims who know and believe their Koran are taught to do. Allah hates the Christians and the Jews. Koranic verses that appear to say to the contrary have all been abrogated. Mail journalists, and FCO lackeys, do your homework, please; this was all very predictable!

William Hague: "I've never heard such claptrap". Clearly he has been in the Westminster bubble for far too long, and he no longer recognises reality. Of course the Foreign and Commonwealth Office is pro-Arab/Islam and anti-Israel. This is the office that has been trying to undermine the Balfour Declaration ever since it was made. They play power politics, and haven't a clue on how to stand up for right against wrong. And equally predictably, the FCO mandarins have captured their Secretary of State. Sure, minister capture is a bigger problem than just at the FCO, but that doesn't mean that it hasn't happened here.

Peter Hitchens notes that freedom of speech has vanished from GB (as was). A policeman at a British airport is quoted as saying "we now live in a different time and some things are not to be said". Peter Hitchens concludes with "What Mr Jones was actually doing was to behave like a free man, instead of the cowed subject of a monitored surveillance state in which most of what we think can no longer be said, and every miserable snitch, snoop and sneak has the power to ruin his neighbour’s life."

"When anarchy erupts on our streets" spouts the Mail doing a puff piece on MetroPlod's systems and procedures for ensuring government control of the streets. Plod has been pushing the "big trouble on our streets soon" message for quite a while. What is their agenda? What do they want to achieve by fomenting trouble in this way?

But with some untoward planning, a story of gang warfare makes a bigger splash in the Mail. The story is of the BlueBlack Gang shooting one of their opposition dead. It seems from this report that Cheshire Plod didn't have sufficient shooters and gas men available, so they hired in those skills from Manchester Plod. The fact that the operation was pre-planned must mean that they planned to kill. Hmmmm. Yokel wonders if the nerve gas that Porton Down is developing for use by the Plod was given an outing here. If it was, then Plod now has two weapon systems (the other being hollow tipped, or dum-dum, bullets) that are outlawed for use in wars between nations, but seem to be perfectly OK for use by the British Government on its own citizens.

Thank God that there is hope to be found in Him, for there is none to be found in Politicians, Allah, or the Police.

Following their successes in Paris (and ignoring of ban), the Jihadis are now winning control of London streets.

As a commenter in the Mail points out, blind eyes are being turned to this obstruction of the Queen's Highway in a manner that would not be available to any other group. We seem to have found the "good" racism, in that same way that the pigs found the "good" two legs in Animal Farm. To close the street and have a party to celebrate the Sovereign's Diamond Jubilee one needs a licence from the local council.

Whatever happened to "nothing to hide, nothing to fear"?

The Mail tells us that Mr Plod is not best pleased that someone seems to have been eavesdropping on his phone calls. Of course when he is eavesdropping on our phone calls and emails and web visits it is perfectly OK. Any objections are a confession that our background deserves further investigation because we must be hiding something naughty.

Compare and contrast with Peel's Principles of Policing (from a site in Canada because no UK Police web site displays a copy).

Yokel was horrified to read in the Mail this weekend about the attack on Bin Laden in his Pakistan hideout!

Of course Pakistan knew where bin Laden was holed up. They play a two faced game, aiding the US in English, and the Islamists in Urdu/Arabic. So what? It's an old game for those with their eyes open (see MEMRI).

No. What troubles Yokel is what the serving United States Secretary of Defense (Leon Panetta) had to say. As well as castigating Pakistan for their feigned ignorance of bin Laden's whereabouts, he also confirmed that a Pakistani national (currently in custody in Pakistan for treason) was the source of the US information. In doing so, he (Leon Panetta) has undoubtedly sentenced this brave doctor to death; probably a painful extrajudicial death.

Yokel concludes that the current US Administration is trying to ensure that it receives no further intelligence, and can therefore justify losing its half hearted fight against the jihadis. How can a government hate its own people so much? Yokel doesn't know, and will refer all additional questions to the British Government, who give the appearance of having already decided to do the same. And it matters not whether the government is red flavour or blue flavour, it makes not a jot of difference to the actions they actually take.